An Examination of the Power of the Dark Side

Entrepreneurship does fuddle a turned side of meat and It Is powerful, Indeed. With rare exceptions, the literature about entrepreneurship Is positive and supportive and implies that uniform benefits go down to the economy, to businesses, and to individuals as a result of entrepreneurship. This is exclusively half the story. A low number of researchers have examined the dysfunctional aspects of entrepreneurship and pointed out that a Dark brass definitely exists (Sets De Varies, 1985 Solomon & Winslow, 988 Winslow & Solomon, 1987 1989).This paper will look at those who turned to the Dark Side for their very existence. The authors have surveyed pris hotshotrs who have been convicted of a felony and who are inspection and repair sentences In a Federal Prison in the Midwest. The participants were enrolled In a continuing education course Involving entrepreneurship and sm totally business startup Ideas and they all espoused a desire to go straight when their sentences had been se rved. How did they become brutals? Did they view their criminal satellites as entrepreneurial ventures? Will they become legitimate entrepreneurs in the here afterward?Can entrepreneurship education alleviate the problems faced by these offenders when released and is there a great or lesser chance of acidifies when these inmates are given the probability to study entrepreneurship while still incarce appraised? If they exist, are Dark Side Entrepreneurs contrasting from main stream Entrepreneurs? These were the questions which drove our research. A major problem veneer association today Is the Impact that the growing number of inmates serving sentences have on the economic vitality of our nation.The problem has been exacerbated because our Jails are not only filled with first time-offenders but with a large commonwealth of double offenders, those returned to prison because nee were unmade to malting a crime-Tree Testily rater Deluge released. concord to the Bureau of Justice (2000), in the United farmings released prisoners were re-arrested at an average rate that was greater than 60%. The high percentage of re-arrested former prisoners is a pass water indication that Just serving ones sentence is not a disablement to committing more criminal acts.The economic greet to society and to those directly stirred by criminal activity is tremendous. According to the Bureau of Justice (2000), one of every fifteen people in the U. S. Will be incarcerated. That normal is staggering. During the past 25 years, the penal system in the United States has apply a dodge of lock me up and throw away the key. As a result, there has been an unprecedented growth in the prison population in the number of incarcerated inmates even though the crime rate has been decreasing.Further exacerbate the situation is that incredibly high rate of recidivism. According to the Three State Recidivism Study (Stouter, Smith, and Tracy, 2001) released inmates reported that less than half had a Job awaiting them after they were freed from prison. While most (about 87% of those who had received training hill in prison and 83% of those who did not participate in training) believed that they had a come on to stay after they were released, the remainder were released as homeless, left to roam the streets, by and large in urban areas.The economic cost of incarceration and the cost to society of criminal activity, plus the lost wages due to imprisonment of convicted workers and the cost of providing welfare for their families is creating a substantial burden on local, state and federal official budgets. The combination of rising costs multiplied by an ever greater number of incarcerated inmates is putting pressure on the penal system to control an alternative, deter strategy for success after release. Is there a strategy that can lead to a lower prisoner population through with(predicate) a decrease in recidivism?