Saturday, February 16, 2019

Essay --

When considering the topic of poverty and hunger, many Americans look out-of-door the borders of the coupled States. However, food hazard is an issue that plagues millions of American households each social class. The United States Department of Agriculture found that 14.5% of American households faced food danger during 2012. These households were defined as having difficulty at some time during the year providing enough food for all their members due to a lack of resources (Nord, Singh, Coleman-Jensen). This is a business that affects the nation entirely. However, there are some states that have a significantly larger population facing food risk. Many, but not all, of these states lie in the South Eastern region of the United States. disseminated sclerosis and Arkansas both have over 19.5% of their populations facing food insecurity (Hunger and Poverty Statistics). The US has been facing food security issues since its establishment. However, the problem began to draw immens e public attention during the Great Depression. While there was not one sole focusing event, the images of bread lines and the millions of starving Americans caused constitution makers to begin drafting legislation to alleviate these issues. This issue of hunger travel from the systematic agenda into the institutional agenda in May of 1939, when the first base Food Stamp Program was piloted (A defraud History on SNAP). However, this program became obsolete after just four years. It was not until 1961 that the federal government reinstituted a food distribution program. In fact, this was chairman John F. Kennedys first executive order (A Short History on SNAP). As time progressed, and political manner changed, many changes, modifications, and amendments have been made to the n... ... this policy, I would argue that the Supplemental food Program (SNAP) is extremely useful and beneficial for the American Public. Personally, I commit that the federal government has a responsibil ity to ensure that the basic ineluctably of its citizens, such as food security, are met. This program has been proven to be effective in reducing the burden of food insecurity on many families and individuals nationwide. After reviewing the costs and efficiency of the program, it is clear that there is very(prenominal) little oversight and administrative cost burden placed on taxpayers. In addition, with stringent policies against SNAP fraud and trafficking, taxpayers can be ensured that their property goes to those in need. After evaluating this policy on several criteria, I conceive that is extremely effective in accomplishing its goal of reducing food insecurity within the United States.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.