A Comparison of Because I Could Not Stop For Death and Up-hill

It is quite a peculiar that thither argon race who are not panic-stricken of dying or death. Admittedly, most of us are either similarly afraid to face death or death itself. However, there are exceptions to the rule and notably, Emily Dickinson and Cristina Rossetti are just some of the people who lovingly welcome the idea. Since both are also poets, they were cap equal to portray their ideas regarding the matter by dint of numberss.In Emily Dickinsons Because I Could Not Stop for wipeout, she used a technique of remembering imagery of/from the past to elucidate never- revokeing conceptions and this she was able to do through establishing a dialectical relationship between hotshots imagination and reality. In her poem, she suggested the subject of interconnection and the reciproc altogethery persistent personalities of the known and unknown through viewing the extra correlations between the both holistically and hierarchically.Moreover, she talks about death and eternity . And from the perspective of eternity, she remembered experiences that happened so long clock ago and from those recollections, she endeavors the eternal world through its rapport with sequential standards.For Dickinson, expiration is a kind and comforting gentleman and she adds positive subtexts about it. In this particular poem, Dickinson eternally combines and increasingly orders the temporal world with divine universe. She was able to dialectically shape some sense from the confines of life therefrom permitting her readers to concord a temporary glance to a universe which have an outwardly different and sporadic stages of existence that at the same sentence is holistically purposed and drawn in (Dickinson).Mean firearm, Cristina Rossetti also flirted with the same topic on her poem Uphill. In this poem, she talks about the never-ending struggles that we have to birth in life. She successfully achieved it by comparing life to an extensive and cloggy journey uphillcoated w ith lots of metaphor that is obvious all throughout the poem.Obviously, the poem is about a traveler inquiring some other traveler about the whole journey. Furthermore, the poem is constructed in such a way that Traveler 1 provide ask a movement and Traveler 2 will answer him back and this goes on until the end of the poem. But yet, if we examine the poem closely, it is more than that.There is so much symbol and allegory in the poem. In this poem, symbolism inspired Rossetti to writethere are overflowing concealed meanings through the use of allegory. Through impending examination, allegory is fabricated in the course of the entire poem sooner then just having it within two lines or so.Nevertheless, the main root that Rossetti wants to impart to her readers is that no matter how long or hard a journey one may encounter, there will be psyche who will never let you go (in this case, God) and that one cannot miss heaven. Since she is darling Anglican, her poems are at the same time about the idea of Death and religion. This particular poem talks about that topic in a sorrowful and death-obsessed manner (Rossetti).Both authors and poems reiterate the concept of death. In these two particular examples, the difference is how the authors created and styled their poems in different manners. Emily Dickinson used metaphors to convey her message while Christina Rossetti used allegory in her poems. This only shows that both are invest authors.But more important than that is the fact that no matter how many people view death as a gruesome loss, there will always be people who are courageous enough to coincide it and welcome it with open armsand these two poets are exception to that.Works CitedDickinson, Emily. Because I Could Not Stop for Death. March 2, 2008 .Rossetti, Christina. Uphill. March 2, 2008